Dr. Ahmed Mostafa ✍️
Between August 2006 and November 2024, Lebanon has demonstrated unwavering commitment to the protection of Palestine, emerging victorious in a multifaceted battle against Israel. Despite significant costs, including economic strain and human suffering, Lebanon has successfully navigated a series of challenges, maintaining its resolve and solidarity with the Palestinian cause. The operational success of the resistance forces, particularly Hezbollah, has been critical in this prolonged struggle. The strategic use of precision-guided missiles and sophisticated surveillance systems has enabled Lebanon to effectively deter Israeli aggression and protect its borders. The International Crisis Group reports a marked reduction in cross-border incidents, a testament to the effectiveness of these measures and the strategic foresight of Lebanese leadership.
The international community has played a crucial role in supporting Lebanon’s efforts to protect Palestine, with diplomatic initiatives like the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 and financial and logistical support from regional allies like Iran and Syria. Public opinion in the region strongly supports Lebanon’s stance, with over 80% of respondents expressing solidarity with the Palestinian cause. Despite the economic impact of the prolonged conflict, Lebanon has managed to mitigate the most severe consequences through strategic economic planning and international aid. The resilience of the Lebanese economy despite the challenges is a testament to the nation’s adaptability and effectiveness of its economic policies.
Natanyahu’s speech to approve the ceasefire with Hezbollah has shown how much he is defeated
Prime Minister Netanyahu’s recent speech to approve the ceasefire with Hezbollah reveals a significant shift in his leadership. The recorded speech, rather than delivered live, reveals a reluctance to face the press and confront the families of victims, injured individuals, and hostages. This choice to avoid live interaction is a clear indication of his reluctance to address the harsh realities and deep-seated grievances of those most affected by the conflict. The failure to achieve the alleged invasion of Lebanon, which Netanyahu had promised following the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, has not materialized as promised, eroding public trust and highlighting a significant gap between his rhetoric and the reality of his leadership. The absence of a clear plan to assist the people of the north in returning to their homes is another critical point.
Netanyahu’s claim that he could separate Hezbollah from Gaza is an egregious misstatement, as Hezbollah is primarily based in Lebanon, not Gaza, under Hamas control. This misstep undermines his credibility and reveals a lack of strategic foresight and a deep misalignment with the realities on the ground. The recorded nature of the speech also speaks to a broader pattern of avoidance and deflection, as it sidesteps the immediate confrontation, ultimately eroded trust essential for effective governance. The failure to recommend the return of the people of the north to their homes underscores a deeper issue: the lack of a coherent and comprehensive strategy for post-conflict recovery.
ICC sentence that issued against Netanyahu and Youaf Galant two weeks ago should include also the regimes and the parliamentary members of the countries that sold weapons and supported Israel
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants against former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Galant, but a critical oversight has emerged. The focus on individual actors fails to address the broader network of complicity that has sustained the Israeli military machine. It is imperative that the ICC’s indictments expand to include not only national leaders but also regimes and parliamentary members from countries that have provided military aid and support to Israel. These entities have played an instrumental role in the perpetuation of the actions that led to the current indictments, and their accountability is essential for a comprehensive and just resolution.
The international community often prioritizes the pursuit of high-profile individuals over systemic issues, which can inadvertently shield the underlying structures that enable such actions. The ICC’s decision to indict Netanyahu and Galant is a significant step, but it must be followed by a broader investigation into the global supply chain of military resources that has facilitated Israeli military operations. The economic implications of the flow of military aid and arms sales from these countries to Israel are not merely bilateral issues but a global one with far-reaching implications.
From a moral and ethical perspective, the international community has a collective responsibility to ensure that all parties involved in conflicts, particularly those involving severe human rights violations, are held accountable. The failure to address this broader complicity sends a dangerous signal that certain actors can evade accountability, thereby eroding the principles of international law and justice. Expanding the ICC’s indictments would enhance the court’s credibility and effectiveness, set a precedent for future cases involving state complicity in international crimes, and empower victims and affected communities by providing a more comprehensive framework for seeking justice and redress.
Hezbollah will never leave the Palestinian case whatsoever happened
Hezbollah’s unwavering commitment to the Palestinian cause has been a constant thread in Middle Eastern politics, reinforced through strategic alliances and military interventions. This steadfast support is not just a political stance but a deeply ingrained ideological principle, rooted in the organization’s founding tenets and shared sense of resistance against perceived injustices. The historical context of this alliance dating back to the early 1980s underscores the depth of this commitment.
Hezbollah’s strategic importance to the Palestinian cause is not overstated, as aligning itself with Palestinian resistance movements solidifies its position as a key player in the Middle East and enhances its legitimacy and influence among Arab and Muslim populations. This alignment serves multiple purposes, including the projection of power, mobilization of resources, and consolidation of ideological narratives. As tensions in the region continue to evolve, Hezbollah’s involvement in Palestinian affairs remains a critical component of its strategic calculus.
The ideological underpinnings of Hezbollah’s support for the Palestinian cause are equally significant. The organization’s founding documents and public statements consistently emphasize the importance of supporting the Palestinian struggle as a moral and religious obligation, which has been instrumental in galvanizing support among its constituency and contributing to the organization’s ability to maintain a strong and loyal following.
From a practical standpoint, Hezbollah’s involvement in Palestinian affairs has been characterized by concrete actions and tangible support. The organization has provided military training, weapons, and financial assistance to Palestinian resistance groups, particularly during critical periods of conflict. This multifaceted approach strengthens Hezbollah’s reputation as a champion of the Palestinian cause and enhances its influence among Palestinian communities.
In conclusion, Lebanon’s 18-year victory in protecting Palestine is a testament to its commitment and strategic acumen. The country’s military prowess, international support, and robust economic planning have been crucial in this endeavor. Despite challenges and sacrifices, the outcomes have been significant, reinforcing the importance of solidarity and resilience. The lessons learned from this experience will guide efforts to promote peace and justice in the region. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to approve the ceasefire with Hezbollah has revealed shortcomings in his leadership, contributing to a perception of defeat and ineffectiveness. The ICC’s recent indictments against Netanyahu and Galant mark a significant moment in the pursuit of justice for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, true justice and accountability require a broader and more inclusive approach that addresses the roles of all parties, including regimes and parliamentary members of countries that have provided military support to Israel. The international community should support this expanded approach, recognizing the pursuit of justice as a collective and continuous effort. Hezbollah’s unwavering commitment to the Palestinian cause, rooted in ideological principles and strategic interests, remains a significant influence in Middle Eastern politics and conflict.
