Ahmed Mostafa ✍️
Communications war still existed between Arabs and Israel so far, as well as between the West versus China and Russia despite the advancements in technology and global communication, the communications war between Arab states and Israel continues to persist. This ongoing conflict has been a significant obstacle in achieving peace and understanding between these two groups. The lack of effective communication channels has led to misunderstandings, mistrust, and further fueled tensions, making it challenging to find a resolution to their differences. Moreover, the communications war is not limited to the Arab-Israeli conflict alone.
There is also an ongoing struggle for influence and control in the realm of international communication between the West, on one hand, and China and Russia on the other. This rivalry extends beyond political ideologies and economic interests, as each side seeks to dominate the narrative and shape public opinion globally. The rise of social media platforms has only intensified this battle, with each side using these channels to spread their message, counter their opponents’ narratives, and sway public opinion in their favor.
Yesterday, a significant cyberattack on pagers took place in Lebanon, allegedly orchestrated by Israel as a form of retaliation. This digital assault is believed to be in response to the attack on Israeli Unit 8200 by Hezbollah last month during the Arbaeeneyah celebrations. Unit 8200 is considered the most elite espionage battalion in Israel, making this counterattack a substantial blow. Furthermore, just a day prior to the pager cyberattack, Houthi forces launched a hyper-sonic ballistic missile targeting Israel.
These recent events highlight the escalating tensions and technological warfare tactics being employed in the region. The consequences of these communications wars are far-reaching and profound. They not only hinder efforts towards peace and cooperation but also undermine trust and understanding among nations. In today’s interconnected world, effective communication is more crucial than ever. It is essential for fostering dialogue, resolving conflicts, and promoting mutual understanding. However, as long as these communications wars persist, the prospects for peace and cooperation will remain elusive.
French writer “Terry Meyssan” exposed Lebanon’s information leaks from Rafiq AlHariri’s fake tribunal, while “Edward Snowden” revealed US and UK espionage on NATO allies, Russia, and China via Ericson Sweden and Nokia Finland.
Terry Meyssan, a renowned French writer, has exposed the vulnerability of Lebanon’s information security following the establishment of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL). Meyssan’s work revealed that the tribunal was a tool for political manipulation and information gathering, rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee, exposed the massive surveillance operations carried out by the US and the UK, revealing that these powerful nations were spying on their perceived enemies, such as Russia and China, and their allies within NATO. This revelation sent shockwaves worldwide, highlighting the extent to which these countries were willing to go to gather intelligence, even at the expense of their own allies.
Snowden’s leaks also implicated major telecommunications companies, Ericsson of Sweden and Nokia of Finland, in the espionage activities of the US and UK. These companies were found to be complicit in allowing the US and UK to tap into their systems and gather sensitive information, raising concerns about the security of global communications networks and the role of private companies in facilitating state-sponsored espionage. Their work serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in international relations and the need for robust safeguards to protect individual privacy and national security.
Israeli espionage companies like “Pegasus” having a greater cooperation with USA telecommunication companies like Qualcomm, as well as UK and UAE, and both Pegasus and Qualcomm operating Apple, Samsung and other top brands of cell phones and pagers except the top level Chinese ones especially Huawei.
Pegasus, an Israeli espionage company, has been gaining popularity in the global surveillance industry due to its advanced technology. The company has increased cooperation with major telecommunication companies, particularly in the USA, UK, and UAE, raising concerns about potential misuse of this powerful technology. One key player in this cooperation is Qualcomm, a leading American telecommunications equipment company. Pegasus specializes in developing spyware that can infiltrate and control mobile devices, allowing for real-time surveillance and data extraction. By integrating Pegasus’ spyware into Qualcomm’s chipsets, telecommunication companies could potentially gain access to sensitive user data without their knowledge or consent.
The UK and UAE have also invested heavily in Israeli technology startups, leading to a significant increase in intelligence and technology sharing between these nations. For example, the UK’s National Crime Agency has reportedly used Pegasus’ spyware to monitor criminal activity, while the UAE has been accused of using similar technology to suppress political dissent.
However, this increased cooperation has sparked concerns about privacy and human rights. Critics argue that the use of such powerful surveillance tools could lead to widespread abuse and violation of individual privacy. Additionally, there are fears that these technologies could fall into the wrong hands, posing a significant threat to global security. As governments and private companies continue to push the boundaries of surveillance technology, it is essential to prioritize ethical considerations and ensure responsible use of these tools.
The pager incident in Lebanon, manufactured by Taiwan-based “Gold Apollo,” raises concerns about potential connections to Israel or the CIA, necessitating immediate investigation
The involvement of the US envoy, Hogestein, in this matter also warrants scrutiny. Reports suggest that he provided Israel with the password for the pagers and CIA might have advised the Zionist side to carry out this attack instead of a land war against Lebanon without a guaranteed victory according to the results of 2006 war which was against Israel, further fueling speculation about the extent of US involvement in this incident. This revelation has significant implications for international relations and security, as it could indicate a level of cooperation between the US and Israel that goes beyond publicly disclosed diplomatic channels.
Moreover, the use of pagers as a means of communication in this incident is noteworthy. Pagers are relatively outdated technology, often associated with the pre-smartphone era. Their deployment in this context raises questions about the intentions behind their use. Were they chosen for their perceived security benefits, such as being less susceptible to interception or hacking compared to modern digital devices? Or was there another reason for selecting this particular form of communication?
In light of these developments, it is essential to conduct a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the pager incident in Lebanon. This should involve not only identifying the supplier of the pagers but also exploring any potential connections to Israeli or CIA interests. And as we know, the USA controls the Taiwanese telecom companies in rivalry war with China. Furthermore, the role of the US envoy in this matter must be fully examined to ensure transparency and accountability in international affairs.
Ultimately, the answers to these questions will be critical in determining the true nature of this incident and its implications for global security. As more information comes to light, it is vital that all parties involved are held accountable for their actions and that measures are taken to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Remarks
Recent revelations highlight the need for caution when choosing electronic products and software. Companies like Pegasus and Qualcomm, along with those associated with CIA, MI5, MI6, or Mossad, should be avoided due to potential surveillance and espionage activities. Consumers should also avoid products from countries like the USA, UK, EU, Canada, UAE, and Taiwan, which have a history of collaborating with intelligence agencies.
The upcoming BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, presents an opportunity for Arab and Muslim countries to collaborate with China and Russia on a groundbreaking initiative. This could lead to the creation of their own search engine, rivaling Google’s dominance. This collaboration would foster economic growth, technological advancement, cultural understanding, and demonstrate the strength of these nations in their pursuit of digital sovereignty. It would also address data privacy and security concerns, establishing a trustworthy alternative to Western search engines.
The Global South, primarily in the Southern hemisphere, is considering purchasing telecommunications products directly from China or Russia to ensure safety and security. This approach bypasses intermediaries, allows better control over procurement, and mitigates data privacy risks. It also fosters stronger diplomatic ties with these nations. However, concerns about product quality and after-sales service need to be addressed before entering into agreements.
