Chief Editor writes
After years of patience at the Armenian violations against the peaceful Azerbaijanis the owners of the stolen lands, rather than waging the war against Baku suddenly.. It was logical that the people of Azerbaijan think of restoration of their dignity and occupied lands. As Azerbaijan could teach the Arminian regime a military lesson of how to war and restore occupied land. However some try to devalue the benefits of the Azerbaijani triumph over Armenia a year ago, but it was not possible in the era of open skies and the plurality of official and unofficial media and communication not to be used in the fateful battle of Karabakh by spreading lies, allegations and rumors within the system of psychological warfare, which is an important axis of Armenia’s strategy to win the sympathy of the world, in order to cover up its aggression and aggression against the Azerbaijani right Over the past thirty years since the Armenian occupation of the Azerbaijani lands, Armenia has succeeded in misleading many countries and organizations with a deceptive media discourse, a discourse that has begun to lose its luster and attractiveness in the face of reality that does not lie, but rather exposes the Armenian deception.
But it is noteworthy that Armenia did not understand the transformations that took place in the world and the changes that occurred in reality, so it wanted to employ the same mechanisms and means to serve its goals, so it resorted to rumors and lies as a weapon to support its position in a war that it started, but the world changed with the facts it witnessed and what it revealed Azerbaijan is one of the facts that confirm the lies and debunking of the Armenian discourse, which was evident in the last battle of the media misinformation war that Azerbaijan succeeded in winning, which confirms that the Azerbaijani capabilities on the battlefield are not limited to military, technological, economic and human capabilities only, but also the media that postponed The facts were revealed, as President Ilham Aliyev was able to neutralize the defamation campaign launched by the pro-Armenian media and single-handedly support the information front. Some Western correspondents who got special assignments distracted the topic, and made baseless accusations against the Azerbaijani side, citing false information. Turkey’s involvement in the conflict, the use of F-35s, the involvement of mercenaries from Syria and Libya, the violation of the ceasefire and many other disturbing questions have been repeatedly raised.
Each time, President Ilham Aliyev refuted these accusations with irrefutable facts and evidence, spoke about the history of Karabakh and the causes of the conflict, and seized the opportunity to bring the truth to the world. An example of this is the question that was put to the president during an interview with the German TV channel ARD, where the question was the following: When we were there, in this field, we had a question. Why is Karabakh so important to Azerbaijan? Are there resources or symbolic meaning? The President’s answer was emphatic: Are Alsace and Lattering important to you? Is Bavaria important to you? Or the Rhine-Westphalia? This is our land, our internationally recognized land. It is not a matter of resources. The main resource here in Baku. This is a matter of justice, it is a matter of national dignity, and this is a matter of international law. The answer, though short, reveals the depth of the president’s meaning.
The days of the war also witnessed a smear campaign full of lies and slander in some foreign media, as if “fighters from Syria are deployed in Azerbaijan.” There is no doubt that Armenia is behind these allegations, which are not based on any facts and spread in the form of interviews with fake people.
In contrast to the situation in Armenia, which over the years has suffered and suffers from a severe demographic crisis and as a result has not been able to equip its armed forces to use mercenaries to fight in its army, Azerbaijan has a full-fledged armed forces, and these armed forces are very professional and strong, there is no need To external forces, especially irregular groups, to achieve the specified goal.
These bogus claims are incompatible from a military technical point of view, because they lack simple logic. Various sources claim that several hundred mercenaries were brought to Azerbaijan. Then such a question arises. In the context of a possible clash between two regular armies, could a small number of irregular groups change the balance of power? Of course, those who spread misinformation cannot answer this question.
Lying, deceit, and altering facts are always characteristics of the occupier so that he can justify his criminal acts, which he commits and performs in the lands he occupied, and Armenia did that during its occupation of the lands of Azerbaijan.
